Psychological empowerment as a predictor of quality in training A glance at the Portuguese context

Main Article Content

Isabel Gomes
Joaquim Luis Coimbra
Isabel Menezes

Abstract

This paper analyses the model of Adult Education and Training (AET) in Portugal, taking into consideration the two available reports on this recent domain, which reveal that empowerment is a prescriptive goal. However, this construct continues to be ill defined.
The empowerment theory suggested by Zimmerman and colleagues, particularly the psychological empowerment construct, shows enough consistency with the AET model to consider that it might contribute to the management of quality in training.
These reports also state the urge for better, more inclusive and more reliable measures in assessing quality in training. Contributions of the empowerment theory to this matter are discussed, attempting to analyze and operationalize it in this specific domain.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gomes, I., Coimbra, J. L., & Menezes, I. (2011). Psychological empowerment as a predictor of quality in training: A glance at the Portuguese context. The Journal of Quality in Education, 2(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.37870/joqie.v2i2.105
Section
Papers

References

[1] Belzer, A. «"It's not like normal school": the role of prior learning contexts in adult learning.», ADULT EDUCATION QUATERLY, vol. 55, No 1, pp. 41-59, 2004.
[2] Amorim, J.P. "A Metamorfose das Borboletas". Tese de Mestrado FPCEUP, Porto, in press.
[3] Bonnet, G. "Evaluation of education in the European Union: policy and methodology", ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION, vol. 11, No 2, pp. 179-191, 2004.
[4] Bowers, C. L., Hitt II, J. M., Hoeft, R. M. & Dunn, S. "Applying training evaluation models to the clinical setting", MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 15, No 1, pp. 17-24, 2003.
[5] Canelas, A. M. "Relatà³rio Nacional "“ Cursos de Educaçà£o e Formaçà£o de Adultos "Em Observaçà£o" 2000/2001", ANEFA, Lisboa, 2002.
[6] Canelas, A. M. "Relatà³rio nacional de avaliaçà£o: cursos de educaçà£o e formaçà£o de adultos 2002/2003", DGFV, Lisboa, 2004.
[7] CEDEFOP. "Lifelong learning: citizen>s views", OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Luxembourg, 2003.
[8] Foster-Fishman, P. G., Salem, D. A., Chibnall, S., Legler, R. & Yapchai, C. "Empirical support for the critical assumptions of empowerment theory". AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 26, No 4, pp. 507-536, 1998.
[9] Frymier, A. B. & Shulman, G. M. "Development and testing of the learner empowerment instrument in a communication based model", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (80th, New Orleans, LA, November 19-22, 1994).
[10] Perkins, D. D. & Zimmerman, M. A. "Empowerment theory, research and practice", AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 23, No 5, pp. 569-579, 1995.
[11] Rose, H. C. "A plan for training evaluation", TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, pp. 38-51, 1968.
[12] Warr, P., Allan, C. & Birdi, K. "Predicting three levels of training outcome", JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 72, pp. 351-375, 1999.
[13] Zimmerman. M. A. "Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations", AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 23, No 5, pp. 581-599, 1995.
[14] Zimmerman, M. A. "Empowerment theory. Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis", In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), "Handbook of Community Psychology", KLUWER ACADEMIC/PLENUM PUBLISHERS, pp. 43-63, New York, 2000.
[15] Zimmerman, M. A, Israel, B A., Schulz, A & Checkoway, B. "Further explorations in empowerment theory: an empirical analysis of psychological empowerment", AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, vol.20, No 6, pp. 707-727, 1992.
[16] Zimmerman, M., A & Warschausky, S. "Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: conceptual and methodological issues", REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 43, No 1, pp. 3-16, 1998.
[17] Zimmerman, M. A, & Zahniser, J. H. "Refinements of sphere-specific measures of perceived control: development of a sociopolitical control scale", JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 19, pp. 189-204, 1991.