Can We Comment on Quality How the M&E Activities Ensuring Quality in Education in the South Asia Sub-Continent?

Main Article Content

Shajedur Rahman

Abstract

This paper analyses the existing literatures about the Quality Assurance process of primary education in three different countries within the south Asia subcontinent namely, India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. It argues that the definition of Quality education is still ambiguous in among the systems. However, this article categories the aspects of quality education from existing literatures and examines the quality assurance systems in the mentioned three countries. Having done so, it shows that the quality assurance systems in all three countries focus differently in various aspects of quality education among which the physical aspects are predominant.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahman, S. (2019). Can We Comment on Quality: How the M&E Activities Ensuring Quality in Education in the South Asia Sub-Continent?. The Journal of Quality in Education, 9(13), 16. https://doi.org/10.37870/joqie.v5i6.42
Section
Papers

References

ALEXANDER, R. 2008. Education For All, The Quality Imperative and the Problem of Pedagogy. CREATE Pathways to Access. Research Monograph No. 20, ERIC.
ALI, M. A. 1998. Supervision for teacher development: A proposal for Pakistan, Unesco, International Institute for Educational Planning.
ANKOMAH, Y. K., J, BOSU, R. & O
DURO, K. 2005. Implementing Quality Education in Low Income Countries Ghana: Institute for Educational Planning & Administration (IEPA), University of Cape Coast
DARLING-HAMMOND, L., JAQUITH, A. & HAMILTON, M. 2012. Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and supporting effective teaching. Stanford, California: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education (SCOPE). Retrieved October 26, 2012.
DISE 2009-10. Elementary Education in India, Progress towards UEE: Flash Statistics. India: National University of Educational Planning and Administration, New Delhi.
DISTRICT INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR EDUCATION. 2001. About DISE [Online]. India: National University of Educational Planning and Administration, New Delhi. Available: http://dise.in/dise2001.htm [Accessed 16/05/2014 2014].
ELIAS, J. & MERRIAM, S. 1995. Philosophy of adult education, 1980"“1994: A bibliographic essay. Philosophical foundations of adult education, 206-242.
JAIN, P. 2012. Progress Of Elementary Education In India. Manzoor Ahmed, 41.
KAYANI, M. M., BEGUM, N., KAYANI, A. & NAUREEN, S. Effectiveness of Monitoring System At Primary Level In Pakistan.
LAMANAUSKAS, V. 2012. Some Features of Education Monitoring. Problems of Management in the 21st Century 4.
NATIONAL EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM 2011. Pakistan Education Statistics 2010-2011. In: MINISTRY OF PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL TRAINING, G. O. P. (ed.). Islamabad: National Education Management Information System.
OPHEIM, V. 2004. Equity in education. Country Analytical Report on Norway. NIFU STEP, Oslo.
PIGOZZI, M. 2000. Quality Education: addressing the MDGs and goal 6 of the Dakar Framework for Action from a Gender Perspective. Paris. Non publié.
SKYINNER, B. 1968. The technology of teaching.
TYLER, R. W. 1949. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago and London.
UNESCO 2002. School Evaluation for Quality Improvement. In: GRAUWE, A. & NAIDOO, J. (eds.). Kuala Lampur, Malaysia: ANTRIEP.
UNESCO, P. 2005. EFA global monitoring report. Paris: Graphoprint, 1.
UNICEF 2000. The State of the World's Children 2004-Girls, Education and Development, Unicef.